Rujuk FatwaMalaysian fatwa reference
BM

FatwaFederal TerritoriesQuran & Hadith

AL-KAFI #1356: ADAKAH MUSHAF AL-QURAN BRAILLE DIHUKUM SEPERTI MUSHAF BIASA

Is a Braille Quran mushaf ruled the same as an ordinary mushaf?

Short answer

A Braille Quran is still regarded as a mushaf and takes the ruling of an ordinary Quran mushaf.

Federal TerritoriesOpinion (irsyad)

A reference, not a fatwa. First sentence of the summary below — read the original fatwa and consult your state authority before acting.

Authority
Federal Territories Mufti Office
Date
Status
Opinion (irsyad)
Series
Al-Kafi li al-Fatawi
Topic
Quran & Hadith

No evidence of gazettement in the source — this is not a gazetted fatwa.

Summary

A Braille Quran is still regarded as a mushaf and takes the ruling of an ordinary Quran mushaf. The fatwa cites Shafi'i scholars who permit writing the Quran in scripts other than Arabic, with the rulings of a mushaf applying to touching and carrying it. Although its letters are formed by raised dots, the reading by visually impaired people is the same as reading an ordinary mushaf, so it must be honoured like standard Arabic script.

Written in our own words from the original fatwa — check the source before acting on it.

Mushaf al-Quran dalam bentuk Braille adalah tetap dihukumkan sebagai mushaf.

Excerpt from the original fatwa · Federal Territories

Read the full fatwa on the Federal Territories website (new tab)

How to cite

Cite the original fatwa and its authority. Rujuk Fatwa is only where you found it.

Federal Territories Mufti Office. “AL-KAFI #1356: ADAKAH MUSHAF AL-QURAN BRAILLE DIHUKUM SEPERTI MUSHAF BIASA”, 30 August 2019. https://muftiwp.gov.my/ms/artikel/al-kafi-li-al-fatawi/3663-al-kafi-1356-adakah-mushaf-al-quran-braille-dihukum-seperti-mushaf-biasa. Found via Rujuk Fatwa: https://rujukfatwa.com/en/fatwa/ruling-braille-quran-same-as-ordinary-mushaf/

Local graph

This fatwa and its nearest connections. The full lists are below.

See it on the full map

Related fatwas from other authorities

Chosen because the topic is close. Each is a separate fatwa — not necessarily an answer to the same question.