Rujuk FatwaMalaysian fatwa reference
BM

FatwaPerakCreed (Aqidah)

Fatwa Mengenai Pengharaman Upacara Perbomohan Ibrahim bin Mat Zin

What is the ruling on the shamanic rituals and practices of Ibrahim bin Mat Zin, also known as Raja Bomoh, in Perak?

Short answer

The Perak Fatwa Committee ruled that the ritual practices of Ibrahim bin Mat Zin are contrary to Islamic law and are haram.

PerakGazetted

A reference, not a fatwa. First sentence of the summary below — read the original fatwa and consult your state authority before acting.

Authority
Perak State Mufti Department
Date
Status
Gazetted
Series
Fatwa Yang Diwartakan
Topic
Creed (Aqidah)

Gazette evidence in the source: No. Warta: 2215

Summary

The Perak Fatwa Committee ruled that the ritual practices of Ibrahim bin Mat Zin are contrary to Islamic law and are haram. The ruling applies whether or not specific objects are used, such as a bird of paradise cage, black sugarcane and a fish trap, and whether the purpose is healing, shamanism or anything else. Muslims are prohibited from adopting, practising, following, possessing or distributing related materials, teaching or spreading it, attending its rituals or supporting its activities, and violators may face action under the law in force in Perak.

Written in our own words from the original fatwa — check the source before acting on it.

adalah berlawanan dengan Hukum Syarak dan haram".

Excerpt from the original fatwa · Perak

Read the full fatwa on the Perak website (new tab)

How to cite

Cite the original fatwa and its authority. Rujuk Fatwa is only where you found it.

Perak State Mufti Department. “Fatwa Mengenai Pengharaman Upacara Perbomohan Ibrahim bin Mat Zin”, 3 August 2015. https://mufti.perak.gov.my/images/Fatwa/35.PerbomohanIbrahimbinMatZin.pdf. Found via Rujuk Fatwa: https://rujukfatwa.com/en/fatwa/ruling-ibrahim-mat-zin-shamanic-rituals-perak/

Local graph

This fatwa and its nearest connections. The full lists are below.

See it on the full map

Related fatwas from other authorities

Chosen because the topic is close. Each is a separate fatwa — not necessarily an answer to the same question.